<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Charleston Got Where It Was</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidfarrow.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/how-charleston-got-where-it-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidfarrow.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/how-charleston-got-where-it-was/</link>
	<description>We're mad as hell and we're not going to take it any more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:00:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://davidfarrow.wordpress.com/2008/05/18/how-charleston-got-where-it-was/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 01:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidfarrow.wordpress.com/?p=34#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Never mind the intrest on the fish tank, how about the accruing intrest on Charleston Palace and on the building that houses Saks?  Have either businesses or the successors on those sites as the shell game plays out shown a profit that then requires them to tend the debt service?  Does instead that debt service still flow from our largesse to the benefit of rich Democrat buddies of Joe that make a commission on arbitraging these opportunities as it seems the plot needs to be rolled over so that teat may be suckled again?  

I&#039;m certain that, at least on paper, the arrangements appear ethical, yet street money isn&#039;t on the campaign filings either.  EFTs leave a paper trail, bagmen doubtless still are about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never mind the intrest on the fish tank, how about the accruing intrest on Charleston Palace and on the building that houses Saks?  Have either businesses or the successors on those sites as the shell game plays out shown a profit that then requires them to tend the debt service?  Does instead that debt service still flow from our largesse to the benefit of rich Democrat buddies of Joe that make a commission on arbitraging these opportunities as it seems the plot needs to be rolled over so that teat may be suckled again?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m certain that, at least on paper, the arrangements appear ethical, yet street money isn&#8217;t on the campaign filings either.  EFTs leave a paper trail, bagmen doubtless still are about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
